Today I read about how the UN wants to ban smacking. My first thought? If they are powerless to influence world leaders, I’m pretty sure they’ve got no chance of changing family choices behind closed doors. Nonetheless, countries who have chosen to outlaw it include Austria, Denmark, Finland, Norway, Germany, Italy, Israel, Iceland, Ukraine, Bulgaria, Hungary, Belgium and Greece. The NSW Committee who examined the current laws opted not to give children the same rights as adults, and smacking (providing it is a reasonable punishment) is still legal.
I’m not a fan of smacking, for any reason. I have never smacked Riley, and don’t intend to anytime soon. But I’m not sure I want the government legislating about appropriate forms of discipline either. The most concerning thing about this article? That the NSW Corrective Services Department recommends the law be amended to reflect that reasonable force should not include the use of a closed fist. On what planet is a closed fist reasonable? And the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission is not buying the whole common sense/in line with community expectations line. They have concerns about flouting the Convention on the Rights of the Child. I have concerns about the logic of community expectations too – I seem to remember it being used to cover all manner of sins in the past.
I do think that it brings up a vast grey area, that perhaps the legal system is ill equipped to deal with. What about a smack on the hand as a deterrent, or for issues of safety? Is a smack on the bottom the same as a slap across the face?
What do you think? Would you be comfortable with the government legislating against smacking?

My name is Zoey. 






























a>

Say It With Facebook