Crying It Out to Create Soldiers

by Zoey @ Good Googs on September 29, 2009

“War babies cry it out shut down’ was a search term on google that landed not just one person on my site, but two this week.

Sleeping

A little odd, but it reminded me of the Channel 4 Show: Bringing Up Baby which attempted to measure the successes and shortcomings of three different parenting methods for babies: Truby King, Dr Spock and the Continuum Concept. Families were set up with a mentor for the style of parenting they had opted to pursue and were guided along the way.

For the blissfully uninitiated, a summary of the parenting methods are:

Benjamin Spock (as detailed by Channel 4)

  • Every baby is different so scheduled feeds won’t necessarily suit it
  • A baby will sleep through the night when it’s ready
  • Babies need plenty of affection
  • Babies should start off sleeping in their parent’s room
  • Breastfeeding is best – but a mother who decides against it for whatever reason should not feel guilty
  • Parents should trust their instincts and not be put off by what anyone else is teling them
  • Mothers should get plenty of rest and draft help if necessary
  • Mothers should take time out for themselves
  • A new mother should remember that her partner was there first and can’t be neglected
  • Dads should only get involved with childcare as much as they feel comfortable

Truby King (as described by Channel 4):

  • Feeding every four hours
  • Night feeds get dropped as soon as possible to minimise length of time parents sleep is disrupted
  • Limiting the amount of contact between baby and carer – 10 minutes of cuddling per day
  • Baby sleeps in own room from day one
  • Baby spends several hours in the garden every day

Continuum Concept (as described by Channel 4):

  • Babies should be born at home
  • Breastfeeding should start within the first 20 minutes of birth
  • Bottle feeding is not an option
  • Feeding is on demand
  • Babies should be held or carried in a sling for the first 6 months
  • Babies shold sleep in bed with their parents
  • Babies should be brought up by the whole ‘tribe’ (friends/family) rather than just by parents

Parenting death match! Who will win? In the end the documentary was marvelously inconclusive but did succeed in creating a firestorm over the 1950s Truby King method and its mentor Claire Verity who also advocated limiting eye contact between parents and babies, not holding the baby close to your body while feeding, and leaving babies to cry because they were only going to start crying again once you put them back down.

Possibly the most fascinating part of the Truby King method, was Truby King himself, who was a staunch breastfeeding advocate and was successful in converting mothers to breastfeeding and away from formula which was at the time just cows milk with sugar in it. His theory of babycare seems completely at odds with his breastfeeding advocacy. For starters, the four hourly feeding schedule would be almost impossible to do if exclusively breastfeeding.

The idea behind King’s method was to create a generation of soldiers. To do this he believed that the best way to promote resilience in babies was through lack of contact with parents and mothers were discouraged from cuddling, comforting or even playing with their babies to this end. For detailed information on resilience and historical methods of babycare you can check out this great article here. The fact that Truby King promoted leaving babies alone as a way of building resilience and independence is proof enough of just how outdated his theories are.

But I digress, back to Bringing Up Baby and Claire Verity.

Since the airing of the show, her qualifications have been discredited and for the most part everyone was disgusted with her and the claim of being a nanny for Jerry Hall and Sting didn’t really change that. Alpha Mommy also has a great post about just how terrifying Verity really is.

What struck me most when watching the series was firstly that the King method was obsessed with life returning to normal – even to the point where the parents would say things like – you wouldn’t even know we had just had twins! Well, if that is the goal for your life to be as though you never had any children – why bother in the first place? The other thing that drives me nuts is the idea that because once babies are allowed to cry it out they start sleeping through the night, this fact is used as evidence that the parenting method ‘works’.

Of course it works – if your only aim is sleep. The very fact that it ‘works’ is concerning enough and evidence enough that it should be avoided. What have you just achieved? Dissociation? Alienation? Hopelessness? And of course if you cry it out eventually any baby will learn to not cry and go to sleep. Is that a worthwhile lesson? While we’re on the topic did you know one of the indicators they look for in abused and neglected children is that they don’t cry?

What’s worse is the requirements of the method seemed unnecessarily harsh. For example: babies have to spend hours at a time outside (even in the dead of winter) because it helps them sleep. So why then does the method require that they be outside on their own, instead of on a walk with one or both of their parents?

To watch parents willingly not cuddle or play with their new babies was heartbreaking. To watch them stop their older children from cuddling or interacting with the new baby was equally hideous. And to have them pronounce that ‘they sleep through’ as if that is some kind of parenting trophy was slightly sickening.

And for the record, before any of the King method babies were sleeping through, the families using the continuum concept were already getting at least 6 hours sleep a night because they co-slept.

Say It With Facebook

  • http://ceaselesspraises.blogspot.com Carrie

    Wow, I’ve never heard of that Truby King method, but how absolutely horrible. Just reading your list of requirements to follow that parenting method made me almost cry.

    The scheduling feeds & CIO concept sounds a lot like Babywise, which I had a bad experience with – people told me before I had my son to read it, and I did, and then I thought that because I fed my child ‘on demand’ that I was doing something WRONG…I had never heard of AP at that point, and thought that ‘all good Christian parents do Babywise’ because that’s pretty much how it was presented to me. I can’t wait to try more AP methods like demand feeding & babywearing with my new daughter, who is supposed to arrive in 11 1/2 weeks. :)

    Thanks so much for sharing this – after your tweets, I was really looking forward to it! :)
    .-= Carrie´s last blog .. =-.

    • http://goodgoog.com zoey @ goodgoog

      @Carrie, I know! People can make you feel like you are scarring your children for you life if you demand feed, co-sleep or whatever else. I definitely got my share of disapproval because my daughter was still being rocked to sleep when she was 11 months old (just as well she was petite!)

      I haven’t read Babywise – but I think Baby Love/The Mighty Toddler (Australian books) are similar. What drives me nuts about them is surely authors should be able to present their opinions without being sarcastic and horrible about attachment parenting.

      Your new daughter will be here in no time! So exciting – I’m planning on having my second (hopefully) towards the end of next year and this time around I’m looking into a baby hammock instead of a cradle/bassinet. And I’m also hoping that I’ll be more comfortable using a sling from early on. First time around I had a sling that was far too complicated for my sleep deprived brain.
      .-= zoey @ goodgoog´s last blog ..Moo! =-.

  • http://animeg.blogspot.com shannon

    Awww…no cuddling? Even I want to cuddle babies, and I’m a childfreer.
    .-= shannon´s last blog .. =-.

    • http://goodgoog.com zoey @ goodgoog

      @shannon, Absolutely no cuddling! Or eye contact! Ever! Because when you make eye contact that’s when the baby knows that they have got you wrapped around their little finger and will proceed to manipulate you for the rest of your life!
      .-= zoey @ goodgoog´s last blog ..Moo! =-.

  • http://www.breastfeedingmomsunite.com Melodie

    I have never heard of Truby King wither. Obviously for good reason! Can you imagine someone inthis day and age proudly exclaiming they follow the King method? Most would likely think they meant they were raising their child as Jesus would or something, completely oblivious to the horridity of it. I can barely believe this exists. It makes my stomach turn!

    • http://goodgoog.com zoey @ goodgoog

      @Melodie, I know! But apparently it was very popular in the 1950s and people still do it today. Even King acknowledged that his method was ‘harsh’. And what’s even crazier is that it completely ignores modern science with regard to baby development/needs etc.
      .-= zoey @ goodgoog´s last blog ..Moo! =-.

  • http://feministadvisoryboard.blogspot.com MadamaAmbi

    good god…when was this Truby King maniac preaching her Mein Kampf? The necessity of attachment, soothing, merging, attunement etc. has been known for DECADES…it’s not new. And, there are even more recent studies that bear out how essential it is to human resilience that babies be consistently and sensitively nurtured. It’s beyond sad…it’s HORRIFYING to me that any friggin’ charlatan sociopath can get serious attention on a subject as essential as childrearing. We need a NATIONAL PROGRAM teaching people the basics of human development, attachment theory, self–psychology, etc., and imo, there is NO time to lose, because we are raising generations of poorly parented and unparented children. If I had my way, you’d have to take a year of classes in parenting in order to get a license to be a parent! No, I’m not kidding. I come from child abuse, I know what child abuse does, I know what neglect does, I see well-meaning parents committing acts of abandonment without any idea of the impact they’re having on their child’s psyche.
    .-= MadamaAmbi´s last blog ..The American Spectator : Women to the Rescue =-.

    • http://goodgoog.com zoey @ goodgoog

      @MadamaAmbi, It was sickening to watch. And Frederick Truby King was actually preaching this nonsense in the early 1900s – hence the obsession with soldiers. And so it wasn’t even based on scientific knowledge of the 1950s (when it was popular), let alone all the wealth of information we have now about how important it is for babies (and children) to be nurtured, responded to and held – particularly with regard to self-confidence and resilience.

      I’m with you on the parenting classes! You have to do it if you want to drive, why not if you want to parent. In fact in Australia you have to do 120 log book hours of driving before you can get your provisional license.
      .-= zoey @ goodgoog´s last blog ..Moo! =-.

  • http://www.unlikelymama.com Amber

    I don’t know how people could do that. Even on the worst nights…I still can’t fathom CIO. I mean, trust me…we’ve considered it…but to just leave a baby alone to cry for hours seems like torture (for both baby and parent).

    There are so many experiments showing that baby mammals need comfort, and yet we think that baby humans can do without after just a few months?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Harlow
    .-= Amber´s last blog ..7 Months – In & Out =-.

    • http://goodgoog.com zoey @ goodgoog

      @Amber, Exactly – especially considering that in the documentary ‘Bringing Up Baby’ was with newborns and only up until the point that they were three months old. Even advocates of sleep training don’t recommend it before 6 months.

  • http://feministadvisoryboard.blogspot.com MadamaAmbi

    you know, we don’t just deprive babies, we also deprive ourselves. In fact, the U.S. is still squeamish about “touchy feely” outside of very boundaried customs like marriage. As adults, we view touch as some kind of strange accessory to the more important transaction of talking. Touch is either sexual or weird…or suspiciously effeminate. WRONG! In my experience, nothing is more healing than touch by a loving, caring person or a person who is a real healer/caregiver.

    Did you ever see a mother kiss her child’s scraped knee or elbow, only to have the child stop crying, calm down and forget about the accident? Did you ever notice that people who are mourning will sit or stand very close to one another, hug spontaneously, offer a hand, rub a back, etc., without any misunderstanding of intent? I could go on and on giving numerous examples of the many ways we ignore or diminish the importance of touch in being human. So, for instance, you might be able to get a visit to a physical therapist paid for by your health insurance (if you’re fortunate enough to have some), but visits to a massage therapist are not considered medically necessary. China has hospitals devoted entirely to massage…or at least they used to…god only knows what’s happening in China these days.

    We are afraid of our own human needs; we do not want to experience our need of other people or the consciousness of our dependence. We split off and deny the physical need for loving, non-sexual touch. We submerge it in an over-sexualized, fantastical video-gameology of conquest and submission because we do NOT want to be reminded of our earliest, most vulnerable psychological substrate, when we were helplessly dependent on the attentiveness of our mother, whose presence or absence absolutely meant either life or death. We do not want to know where we came from. We do not want to acknowledge primal intimacy of our mothers. This is part of what I call Patriarchal Disorder, and this is one of the cornerstones of my feminism.
    .-= MadamaAmbi´s last blog ..The American Spectator : Women to the Rescue =-.

  • Pingback: Good Goog » Favourite Blog Posts of 2009

Previous post:

Next post: